Tolling to Pay for Oregon’s “Band Aid”

Tolls to Pay for Oregon’s Band-Aid

What ODOT isn’t telling you

(Clark County Today published my piece, here.)

In Oregon’s outrageous TOLLING scheme, ODOT shares examples from around the country (and the world) of tolling and “congestion pricing”. Sadly, they’re only telling part of the story. Here’s more of what you should know.

A five-member unelected board will make the final decision on which plan is submitted to the federal government for approval. The Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) will also decide the amounts of the tolls. They’ll also decide where in Oregon, the money will be spent. It doesn’t have to be spent on either I-5 or I-205.

Two OTC members chair the tolling Policy Advisory Committee (PAC). OTC member Alando Simpson stated at the end of the February PAC meeting: “tolling and congestion pricing is just a band aid to the wound. It really doesn’t solve the bigger issue.”

How much should SW Washington citizens be paying for Oregon’s “band aid”?

 

The Portland Mercury reports: “In fact, according to a firm hired by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), none of the dozen highway-widening projects that are currently being planned in and around Portland by state officials would be enough in coming years to stem the increasing congestion choking Portland highways.” (here).

Citizens understand that to be true because it’s been over 35 years since new freeway capacity was added to the region. I-205 opened in December 1982. Regional population has since doubled. The Portland metro region now has the 12th worst traffic congestion in the nation, with 35 bottlenecks.

One source reported that Portland would be the ONLY city in the U.S. to toll ALL LANES of their interstate freeways, if they adopt one option. Option C: “Toll all I-5 and I-205 lanes. All lanes in both directions of I-5 and I-205 would be tolled from the Oregon side of the Columbia River to the junction of the two highways north of Wilsonville.”

In Seattle, WSDOT tolls both I-405 and state highway 520. What doesn’t ODOT tell you about these two tolling projects?

On I-405, they built new lanes in each direction, adding much needed capacity! (The ODOT proposals won’t add new through lanes to either I-5 or I-205). Citizens were originally promised a new “general purpose lane”. Later the new lane switched to a second HOV lane with TOLLS on both HOV lanes.

Camas resident Margaret Tweedt at the March 27 County Council presentation shared that on Seattle’s 520 bridge, the toll is $4.30 for citizens who buy a transponder for payment. But for those who pay cash, there is a 46 percent premium – $6.30 for “pay by mail”. Presumably those without transponders are non-local residents, tourists, and most likely, the poor. Charging the poor 46 percent more is one more very negative “equity” issue, demonstrating what another Clark County citizen, Steven Wallace called, “a war on the poor”.

Tweedt also asked: “what percentage of tolling revenues will be paid to the tolling companies?” The Washington Policy Center estimated that collection consumed 40% of the I-405 revenue. That’s what I told the audience. That’s outrageously expensive in my mind.

Washington State Transportation Commissioner Roy Jennings confronted me after the March County Council presentation. He alleged that my “40 percent” response was cherry picking; using the minimum “fee” paid for collection versus the minimum75 cent toll. His own agency, the WSTC confirmed the overall “cost of collection” on I-405 was 35 percent. Apparently the WSTC Vice Chairman isn’t up to speed on the details of his own business.

This level of the “cost of collection” was indirectly confirmed by ODOT’s Mandy Putney in an April presentation to our Regional Transportation Council. “Some of these scenarios might not raise much more than the cost to cover the operations of the tolling system.”

Both federal and state law requires cars in the toll lanes maintain an average speed of 45 mph or faster, 90 percent of the time during peak periods. I-405 fails this requirement. (here). Furthermore, WSDOT apparently expanded the times labeled “peak periods” so that overall, the freeway met, or came closer to meeting federal standards. (here).

ODOT and WSDOT fail to provide any information about “traffic diversion” due to the Seattle I-405 or 520 tolls. But we know it is real. At the Feb. 28 ODOT tolling meeting, Clackamas County Commissioner Paul Savas reported that 50,000 vehicles are presently diverting due to traffic congestion in the Portland metro region.

On 520, the Seattle Times reports:

“found examples of how enormous 520 bridge toll bills, some topping $10,000 with all the fines, had, no joke, caused some low-income drivers to file for personal bankruptcy or even flee the state.”

“At one point three years ago, before the state finally agreed to ease up on its rigid fine collection, an astonishing 90,000 local drivers owed $53 million in back tolls and fines. Unable to pay, some of them simply abandoned their cars when the state placed holds on their license tabs.

 

In London, cited by ODOT as an international example of pricing all roads in a congested city, there’s more you need to know. They charge $16 to drive anywhere in an 8 square mile area of London. According to the Seattle Times, London’s tolls only reduced traffic by 15%. Furthermore, “it took 1,360 cameras to set up London’s cordon, and last year just the cost of running the system was an insane $120 million. That’s all dollars hoovered out of the public to benefit some private photo-tolling corporation.”

 

ODOT cites a congestion pricing program in Virginia. On I-66, the tolls began late last year. What ODOT isn’t telling people is that “so far”, the maximum one-way toll hit $47. (here). Furthermore, at 5:30 in the morning, when there was no congestion, drivers have been charged up to $8.50 to drive on a nearly empty road. (2 side-by-side graphics – one showing $47 toll; the other showing $8.50 at 5:30 a.m.)

The Oregon transportation plan and tolling were created by HB 2017. You’ll see references to Oregon spending $450 million on the Rose Quarter. We know this is the real bottleneck on I-5. What ODOT and the press aren’t telling you is that HALF of the $450 million will be spent on “community redevelopment”, not adding lanes or fixing traffic safety issues.

Why is Oregon spending transportation dollars for “community redevelopment”? It’s pork barrel spending, for sure. Two concrete “lids” approximately two blocks wide, will be built over the top on I-5 at the Rose Quarter. Additionally, a bicycle & pedestrian bridge will cross over I-5. It could cost “$30 – $50 million” according to an ODOT staffer. (graphic)

According to ODOT, this stretch of I-5 at the Rose Quarter boasts the highest crash rate of any highway in the state. It has three times the accident rate of the Terwiliger Curves. Part of the $450 million plan will add “auxiliary lanes” and shoulders to I-5. They will also move an on-ramp. While all this will hopefully reduce accidents by 30-50 percent according to ODOT, it will continue to have the “highest accident rate” in Oregon. This confirms the current proposal is “a band aid” and not truly solving either the safety or the congestion problems.

 

But the greatest outrage of all, is how this “Value Pricing” Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) is or more appropriately isn’t working. The staff originally proposed eight options for consideration and discussion. It was a reasonable start. (graphic).

At the Feb 28th PAC meeting, the ODOT staff and hired outside consultants, recommended narrowing the options down to four major choices, and one minor (unlikely) choice.

NONE of the 25 PAC members got to vote or rank their preferences for the original eight options before they were reduced.

One of the original options immediately jumped out as having the “best” impact on congestion, and likely reduced traffic diversion. Option 4 proposed adding a new lane in each direction on both I-5 and I-205. (graphic)

The staff eliminated this from consideration due to the alleged “astronomical” cost. When asked by PAC members what the cost was, the staff didn’t have an answer. No costing models were done on any of the options.

PAC members asked for numbers on traffic diversion for each option. No numbers were provided, as they didn’t exist. As mentioned above, 50,000 vehicles current divert in the Portland metro area to side streets. It clearly becomes a safety issue for neighborhoods with that many vehicles using side roads and our cell phone GPS technology recommending alternate routes. Yet ODOT didn’t provide any data before eliminating several options.

Besides not allowing the PAC members to rank order their preferences on the original eight options, the staff failed to have the PAC vote whether or not to accept or reject the five recommended options they proposed move forward for further study.

At the very end of the Feb. 28th meeting, PAC members are getting up from the table and leaving the room. The staffer running the meeting says: “we didn’t reach a consensus”. She then asks another staffer: “did we get enough input to move forward?” You don’t see or hear the answer, but the person asking says “okay”. The meeting ends. (video).

 

(possible Ley 90-second comment video at April PAC meeting). (Is it possible to merge the Ley “citizen” comments, and then either one or both Paul Savas comments into one video?)

 

This is an incredible study in government bureaucracy, where elected leaders have little to no say in final outcomes. This is how Oregon will impose tolls.

Their stated goal is to get people to change their driving or transportation habits. Why doesn’t government change their office hours and transportation habits? Instead, they seek to impose financial hardship on citizens, forcing us to change ours. As Ann Donnelly said in a recent column: Laboratory rats in a behavior-modification experiment.”

Citizens should use this knowledge to make input to the next ODOT “Town Hall” here in Clark County. It will be Monday, April 30, 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., Marshall Community Center / Leupke Center, 1009 E McLoughlin Blvd Vancouver. They should also communicate to PAC members Vancouver Mayor Ann Ogle, County Council member Eileen Quiring, and Chris Strickler of WSDOT.